Elo Ratings

Here we compute the Elo ratings of all the gomoku AIs which have ever taken part in gomocup, based on the historical competition results (2000 – present). An AI would has a formal general rating only if there exist at least 100 game records for it (This threshold is 50 for freestyle ratings, 100 for fastgame ratings and 20 for standard and renju ratings).

The Gomoku Rating:

The Freestyle Rating (Best Versions Only)
The Fastgame Rating (Best Versions Only)
The Standard Rating (Best Versions Only)

The Freestyle Rating (All Versions)
The Fastgame Rating (All Versions)
The Standard Rating (All Versions)

The Renju Rating:

The Renju Rating (Best Versions Only)
The Renju Rating (All Versions)

The Freestyle Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2409 124 93 360 98% 1734 0%
2 GORO 2015 1981 100 91 88 75% 1739 0%
3 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 1951 30 29 838 72% 1742 0%
4 SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 1937 70 67 144 67% 1778 0%
5 TITO 1.3 (2010) 1928 60 56 186 72% 1739 0%
6 HEWER 3.5 (2014) 1887 112 105 54 65% 1760 0%
7 SWINE 3.2 (2011) 1843 68 66 144 67% 1644 0%
8 ONIX 2.0.1B (2016) 1843 34 33 876 74% 1473 0%
9 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 1810 42 41 360 55% 1774 0%
10 HGARDEN 1.3 (2007) 1739 34 33 640 64% 1571 0%
11 WINE 2017 1696 33 32 1008 73% 1326 0%
12 EMBRYO 0.4.4.1173 (2017) 1647 32 32 1008 70% 1330 0%
13 PELA ACA2015 1632 72 70 280 77% 1206 0%
14 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1608 32 32 1008 67% 1333 0%
15 GMOTOR 2011 1555 28 28 1012 35% 1700 0%
16 HFM 2008 1549 83 81 108 65% 1360 0%
17 KANEC 2006 1509 67 66 186 66% 1308 0%
18 CHIS 4.5 (2017) 1472 48 51 360 19% 1797 0%
19 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1455 35 35 720 44% 1519 0%
20 XOXO 5.4.2 (2017) 1442 48 47 360 69% 1241 0%
21 HIGHFIVE 0.7 (2014) 1429 54 53 334 62% 1280 0%
22 BETA 1.0 (2005) 1362 72 72 130 58% 1250 0%
23 BESTMOVE 2004 1292 33 33 710 55% 1231 0%
24 EULRING 3.0 (2016) 1286 34 34 732 61% 1174 0%
25 AMOEBA 5.3 (2009) 1283 81 76 144 72% 1059 0%
26 PECUCHET 2007 1204 24 24 1248 43% 1283 0%
27 JUDE 1.0 (2007) 1200 24 24 1248 49% 1229 0%
28 SPARKLE 2.2 (2017) 1172 44 44 360 43% 1259 0%
29 IGNITOR 1.0 (2016) 1100 47 46 372 52% 1111 0%
30 MENTAT Q1.4 (2003) 1085 46 44 326 65% 976 5%
31 KRYSA 2002 1080 42 40 406 67% 947 1%
32 NOESIS 2004 1065 21 22 1638 36% 1230 1%
33 NABAMOKU 2007 1011 122 134 54 28% 1247 0%
34 TRUNKAT 2002 1000 26 26 960 50% 1035 1%
35 PUREGM 2011 993 80 77 108 57% 961 0%
36 IMRO 1.2 (2015) 972 34 35 656 31% 1189 1%
37 PUSKVOREC 2003 969 21 20 1716 41% 1082 0%
38 FASTGOMOKU 1416 932 48 50 360 19% 1275 2%
39 PISQ 5 (2000) 897 36 36 458 47% 937 3%
40 DJALL 1.1 (2017) 853 51 49 288 49% 955 1%
41 LICHT 1.0 (2014) 814 32 32 656 44% 940 0%
42 BRUTEFOR 2002 811 30 31 644 35% 974 7%
43 STAHLFAUST 1.0 (2016) 806 39 39 468 42% 978 0%
44 VALKYRIE 1.0 (2013) 792 31 31 716 43% 930 0%
45 LEONARDO 2001 792 26 26 972 34% 974 2%
46 BENJAMIN 2003 789 25 26 1026 33% 991 6%
47 FIVEROW 2008 782 26 26 1058 34% 1000 0%
48 AI 620 (2002) 754 55 57 190 30% 927 3%
49 DEEPBLUE 2000 742 80 83 84 39% 824 0%
50 PUREROCKY 2016 740 39 39 468 35% 983 1%
51 CRUSHER 2010 672 29 29 848 30% 923 0%
52 CURNPIS 2000 662 29 30 888 21% 978 3%
53 PROLOG 0.1 (2014) 623 34 36 656 24% 954 0%
54 MUSHROOM 3.14159 (2011) 383 43 48 812 8% 951 0%

The Fastgame Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.4.35 (2015) 2297 217 143 232 99% 1191 0%
2 GORO 2016 2073 91 80 372 94% 1226 0%
3 HEWER 3.6 (2015) 1930 36 35 1444 89% 1252 0%
4 SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 1863 42 41 840 85% 1277 0%
5 TITO 1.3.2 (2014) 1855 32 31 1606 86% 1253 0%
6 SWINE 3.5 (2017) 1789 40 39 840 81% 1279 0%
7 CARBON 2.3 (2016) 1780 66 64 372 83% 1235 0%
8 HGARDEN 1.3 (2007) 1705 33 32 1336 84% 1189 0%
9 WINE 2017 1695 38 37 840 76% 1282 0%
10 PELA ACA2015 1663 84 81 224 79% 1197 0%
11 EMBRYO 0.4.4.1173 (2017) 1658 37 37 840 74% 1283 0%
12 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1630 37 36 840 72% 1284 0%
13 GMOTOR 2011 1606 25 24 2050 73% 1245 0%
14 CHIS 4.5 (2017) 1598 36 36 840 70% 1284 0%
15 HFM 2008 1545 97 94 120 78% 1164 0%
16 XOXO 5.4.2 (2017) 1505 36 36 840 64% 1287 0%
17 HIGHFIVE 0.7 (2014) 1480 84 82 162 65% 1257 0%
18 KANEC 2009 1466 22 22 2320 65% 1243 0%
19 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1456 36 36 840 61% 1289 0%
20 AMOEBA 2010 1325 34 33 976 59% 1214 0%
21 EULRING 3.0 (2016) 1310 30 30 1212 53% 1280 0%
22 LICHT 1.0 (2014) 1283 26 26 1606 52% 1271 0%
23 PECUCHET 2007 1230 20 20 2548 50% 1244 0%
24 JUDE 1.0 (2007) 1219 20 20 2548 50% 1244 0%
25 SPARKLE 2.2 (2017) 1219 36 36 840 46% 1295 0%
26 IGNITOR 1.0 (2016) 1139 51 50 372 44% 1256 1%
27 MENTAT Q1.6 (2005) 1086 19 19 2694 41% 1243 2%
28 NOESIS 2004 1061 25 25 1466 38% 1264 2%
29 TRUNKAT 2002 1060 28 28 1088 41% 1194 0%
30 IMRO 1.2 (2015) 1019 27 27 1444 34% 1280 1%
31 PUSKVOREC 2003 1011 19 19 2694 35% 1246 0%
32 NABAMOKU 2008 1000 28 28 1228 36% 1222 0%
33 PUREGM 2012 965 56 57 306 31% 1249 0%
34 FASTGOMOKU 20140209 (2014) 957 27 27 1374 29% 1289 2%
35 PISQ 7 (2004) 938 19 19 2694 30% 1248 0%
36 DJALL 1.1 (2017) 904 35 36 840 24% 1304 3%
37 LEONARDO 2001 891 29 29 1088 27% 1202 0%
38 BENJAMIN 2003 862 19 20 2694 24% 1251 2%
39 AI 1000 (2002) 837 29 30 1088 23% 1204 0%
40 VALKYRIE 1.0 (2013) 822 26 26 1762 21% 1279 0%
41 STAHLFAUST 1.0 (2016) 807 31 32 1212 20% 1295 0%
42 FIVEROW 2008 773 22 22 2440 18% 1263 0%
43 CURNPIS 2000 728 32 33 1088 15% 1210 1%
44 PUREROCKY 2016 727 33 34 1212 15% 1297 1%
45 CRUSHER 2010 669 26 27 2188 13% 1272 0%
46 PROLOG 0.1 (2014) 610 45 48 766 11% 1269 0%
47 MUSHROOM 3.14159 (2011) 416 39 42 2050 4% 1284 0%

The Standard Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2409 146 105 216 98% 1745 1%
2 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 1978 49 47 312 70% 1784 4%
3 SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 1958 59 57 216 68% 1795 3%
4 TITO 1.3.2 (2014) 1944 44 42 404 69% 1759 1%
5 HEWER 3.6 (2015) 1928 44 43 368 67% 1772 4%
6 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1665 55 56 216 36% 1828 0%
7 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 1624 55 56 216 32% 1832 2%
8 GMOTOR 2011 1595 37 37 482 31% 1793 2%
9 PELA 7.5 (2006) 1572 61 64 162 32% 1742 2%
10 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1507 59 64 216 19% 1845 0%

The Complete Freestyle Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2409 124 93 360 98% 1734 0%
YIXIN 0.6.9 (2016) 2307 144 106 144 95% 1747 0%
YIXIN 0.4.35 (2015) 2245 173 124 88 94% 1715 0%
YIXIN 0.4.3 (2014) 2174 191 136 54 93% 1728 0%
YIXIN 0.2.17C (2013) 2003 127 110 48 77% 1773 0%
2 GORO 2015 1981 100 91 88 75% 1739 0%
GORO 2017 1962 47 44 360 72% 1764 0%
3 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 1951 30 29 838 72% 1742 0%
GORO 2016 1937 70 67 144 67% 1778 0%
4 SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 1937 70 67 144 67% 1778 0%
5 TITO 1.3 (2010) 1928 60 56 186 72% 1739 0%
SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 1901 44 43 360 66% 1768 0%
GORO 2013 1899 101 92 102 80% 1539 0%
6 HEWER 3.5 (2014) 1887 112 105 54 65% 1760 0%
TITO 1.3.2 (2014) 1883 32 32 646 63% 1769 0%
YIXIN 0.2.14P (2012) 1875 97 90 96 78% 1544 0%
HEWER 3.6 (2015) 1874 34 33 592 62% 1770 0%
GORO 2010 1862 138 120 42 76% 1637 0%
HEWER 3.4 (2012) 1854 77 76 90 57% 1797 0%
7 SWINE 3.2 (2011) 1843 68 66 144 67% 1644 0%
8 ONIX 2.0.1B (2016) 1843 34 33 876 74% 1473 0%
GORO 2011 1828 100 96 54 59% 1756 0%
SWINE 3.5 (2017) 1827 42 41 360 57% 1773 0%
TITO 1.1 (2007) 1826 133 107 108 92% 1280 0%
SWINE 3.2 (2014) 1814 106 104 54 56% 1768 0%
9 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 1810 42 41 360 55% 1774 0%
CARBON 2.3 (2016) 1804 54 53 516 82% 1268 0%
SWINE 3.4 (2015) 1804 53 53 232 53% 1776 0%
ONIX 2.0.1 (2010) 1766 97 97 54 50% 1763 0%
YIXIN 0.2.7 (2011) 1758 80 79 210 81% 1222 0%
10 HGARDEN 1.3 (2007) 1739 34 33 640 64% 1571 0%
GORO 2012 1737 108 116 42 38% 1821 0%
ONIX 2.0 (2008) 1727 76 71 162 81% 1356 0%
HEWER 3.3 (2010) 1724 75 75 96 50% 1719 0%
SWINE 3.3 (2013) 1714 106 113 48 38% 1809 0%
GORO 2014 1714 104 106 54 43% 1780 0%
GORO 2005 1701 83 73 208 88% 1231 0%
11 WINE 2017 1696 33 32 1008 73% 1326 0%
HEWER 3.2 (2009) 1696 112 105 48 67% 1549 0%
TITO 1.2 (2008) 1696 73 68 156 77% 1393 0%
TITO 1.0 (2006) 1691 117 106 78 82% 1271 0%
SWINE 3.1 (2010) 1663 97 91 90 71% 1452 0%
12 EMBRYO 0.4.4.1173 (2017) 1647 32 32 1008 70% 1330 0%
13 PELA ACA2015 1632 72 70 280 77% 1206 0%
HGARDEN 0.4 (2006) 1623 110 102 78 78% 1280 0%
GORO 2009 1621 83 78 144 79% 1282 0%
GORO 2007 1615 94 88 102 75% 1313 0%
HEWER 2008 1610 86 82 108 71% 1353 0%
14 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1608 32 32 1008 67% 1333 0%
SWINE 2007 1595 92 88 102 74% 1316 0%
SWINE 2008 1581 88 85 114 73% 1292 0%
ONIX 2.0 (2007) 1556 85 82 120 71% 1307 0%
15 GMOTOR 2011 1555 28 28 1012 35% 1700 0%
16 HFM 2008 1549 83 81 108 65% 1360 0%
PELA 7.5 (2006) 1542 30 30 836 53% 1492 0%
PELA 7.8 (2017) 1533 45 47 360 24% 1793 0%
SWINE 2005 1513 62 60 208 73% 1253 0%
SLOWRENJU 3.1 (2013) 1510 106 94 168 88% 1006 0%
17 KANEC 2006 1509 67 66 186 66% 1308 0%
PELA 7.7 (2016) 1496 77 84 144 19% 1815 0%
SWINE 2004 1493 99 85 196 91% 991 0%
SWINE 3.0 (2009) 1488 107 116 48 38% 1575 0%
SLOWRENJU 4.1 (2015) 1480 67 67 184 50% 1485 0%
GORO 2004 1474 95 82 196 90% 993 0%
18 CHIS 4.5 (2017) 1472 48 51 360 19% 1797 0%
SLOWRENJU 4.0 (2014) 1472 80 80 120 47% 1512 0%
19 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1455 35 35 720 44% 1519 0%
KANEC 2009 1444 26 26 1200 59% 1359 0%
20 XOXO 5.4.2 (2017) 1442 48 47 360 69% 1241 0%
CHIS 2016 1436 49 48 516 60% 1293 0%
PELA 7 (2005) 1432 74 72 130 67% 1240 0%
21 HIGHFIVE 0.7 (2014) 1429 54 53 334 62% 1280 0%
HFM 2010 1418 87 88 90 43% 1484 0%
HGARDEN 0.2 (2005) 1406 75 72 130 68% 1218 0%
SWINE 2003 1401 145 108 130 95% 885 0%
ZETOR 3 (2016) 1382 69 64 192 69% 1209 0%
22 BETA 1.0 (2005) 1362 72 72 130 58% 1250 0%
KANEC 2008 1348 83 87 108 44% 1382 0%
ZETOR 1 (2015) 1346 85 82 96 64% 1221 0%
GMOTOR 4.0.2 (2007) 1342 48 48 312 49% 1339 0%
GMOTOR 2005 1310 73 72 130 54% 1268 0%
23 BESTMOVE 2004 1292 33 33 710 55% 1231 0%
24 EULRING 3.0 (2016) 1286 34 34 732 61% 1174 0%
25 AMOEBA 5.3 (2009) 1283 81 76 144 72% 1059 0%
AMOEBA 2010 1277 43 43 366 46% 1329 0%
ZETOR 0.7 (2014) 1210 76 73 150 65% 1042 0%
26 PECUCHET 2007 1204 24 24 1248 43% 1283 0%
27 JUDE 1.0 (2007) 1200 24 24 1248 49% 1229 0%
28 SPARKLE 2.2 (2017) 1172 44 44 360 43% 1259 0%
XOXO 3.0.6 (2016) 1164 48 47 372 58% 1107 0%
KANEC 2005 1159 74 77 130 36% 1291 0%
HEWER 2.4 (2004) 1132 61 59 196 64% 1017 1%
HFM 2009 1132 158 255 48 4% 1619 0%
29 IGNITOR 1.0 (2016) 1100 47 46 372 52% 1111 0%
30 MENTAT Q1.4 (2003) 1085 46 44 326 65% 976 5%
31 KRYSA 2002 1080 42 40 406 67% 947 1%
HEWER 0.274 (2003) 1077 75 70 130 70% 910 0%
MENTAT Q1.6 (2005) 1076 23 23 1420 37% 1231 1%
32 NOESIS 2004 1065 21 22 1638 36% 1230 1%
MENTAT 1.8 (2001) 1032 121 104 60 80% 768 0%
PISQ 4 (2000) 1018 268 179 16 88% 743 0%
33 NABAMOKU 2007 1011 122 134 54 28% 1247 0%
34 TRUNKAT 2002 1000 26 26 960 50% 1035 1%
35 PUREGM 2011 993 80 77 108 57% 961 0%
NABAMOKU 2008 978 29 29 828 41% 1091 0%
36 IMRO 1.2 (2015) 972 34 35 656 31% 1189 1%
37 PUSKVOREC 2003 969 21 20 1716 41% 1082 0%
PUREGM 2012 965 66 64 138 57% 905 0%
GMOTOR 2006 960 160 159 30 33% 1183 0%
MENTAT X1.9 (2002) 956 83 78 80 66% 843 8%
38 FASTGOMOKU 1416 932 48 50 360 19% 1275 2%
PISQ 3 (2000) 908 204 164 16 75% 743 0%
FASTGOMOKU 20140209 (2014) 903 40 40 456 37% 1077 2%
39 PISQ 5 (2000) 897 36 36 458 47% 937 3%
PISQ 7 (2004) 894 21 21 1818 37% 1069 0%
PUREGM 2013 861 62 61 158 49% 891 0%
40 DJALL 1.1 (2017) 853 51 49 288 49% 955 1%
PISQ 6 (2003) 848 69 70 120 42% 931 0%
IMRO 1.0 (2013) 815 64 64 144 49% 844 0%
41 LICHT 1.0 (2014) 814 32 32 656 44% 940 0%
42 BRUTEFOR 2002 811 30 31 644 35% 974 7%
43 STAHLFAUST 1.0 (2016) 806 39 39 468 42% 978 0%
44 VALKYRIE 1.0 (2013) 792 31 31 716 43% 930 0%
45 LEONARDO 2001 792 26 26 972 34% 974 2%
46 BENJAMIN 2003 789 25 26 1026 33% 991 6%
47 FIVEROW 2008 782 26 26 1058 34% 1000 0%
HRUBASILA 2000 758 137 148 24 38% 840 0%
PUREGM 2009 755 104 109 48 38% 868 0%
48 AI 620 (2002) 754 55 57 190 30% 927 3%
AI 1000 (2002) 746 29 30 784 28% 985 3%
49 DEEPBLUE 2000 742 80 83 84 39% 824 0%
50 PUREROCKY 2016 740 39 39 468 35% 983 1%
XOXO 1.12 (2015) 716 74 76 104 39% 834 0%
51 CRUSHER 2010 672 29 29 848 30% 923 0%
52 CURNPIS 2000 662 29 30 888 21% 978 3%
FASTGOMOKU 20150225 (2015) 658 75 80 104 32% 838 1%
53 PROLOG 0.1 (2014) 623 34 36 656 24% 954 0%
PUREGM 2008 613 148 201 48 8% 1158 0%
AI 016 (2001) 517 113 141 60 13% 854 0%
54 MUSHROOM 3.14159 (2011) 383 43 48 812 8% 951 0%

The Complete Fastgame Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.4.35 (2015) 2297 217 143 232 99% 1191 0%
YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2214 79 67 840 97% 1267 0%
YIXIN 0.6.9 (2016) 2167 110 91 372 97% 1223 0%
2 GORO 2016 2073 91 80 372 94% 1226 0%
YIXIN 0.4.3 (2014) 2041 136 111 162 94% 1236 0%
GORO 2015 2037 117 101 232 93% 1200 0%
GORO 2014 1989 123 105 162 93% 1238 0%
GORO 2017 1968 48 45 840 90% 1274 0%
YIXIN 0.2.17C (2013) 1931 124 104 156 93% 1175 0%
3 HEWER 3.6 (2015) 1930 36 35 1444 89% 1252 0%
HEWER 3.5 (2014) 1913 109 98 162 90% 1241 0%
HEWER 3.4 (2012) 1885 81 73 300 91% 1179 0%
4 SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 1863 42 41 840 85% 1277 0%
5 TITO 1.3.2 (2014) 1855 32 31 1606 86% 1253 0%
SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 1821 68 65 372 85% 1234 0%
YIXIN 0.2.14P (2012) 1800 106 96 144 88% 1184 0%
GORO 2013 1791 100 93 156 87% 1181 0%
HEWER 3.2 (2009) 1790 130 107 132 92% 1178 0%
6 SWINE 3.5 (2017) 1789 40 39 840 81% 1279 0%
SWINE 3.2 (2014) 1784 96 91 162 83% 1246 0%
7 CARBON 2.3 (2016) 1780 66 64 372 83% 1235 0%
TITO 1.1 (2007) 1767 155 123 108 94% 1141 0%
CARBON 2.4 (2017) 1765 39 38 840 80% 1280 0%
SWINE 3.4 (2015) 1759 51 50 604 82% 1226 0%
TITO 1.3 (2010) 1756 50 48 582 87% 1179 0%
SWINE 3.2 (2011) 1743 70 66 288 86% 1180 0%
SWINE 3.3 (2013) 1742 96 91 156 84% 1183 0%
TITO 1.2 (2008) 1729 81 74 252 89% 1169 0%
8 HGARDEN 1.3 (2007) 1705 33 32 1336 84% 1189 0%
HEWER 3.3 (2010) 1702 69 65 282 85% 1176 0%
9 WINE 2017 1695 38 37 840 76% 1282 0%
YIXIN 0.2.7 (2011) 1672 93 89 144 83% 1175 0%
GORO 2010 1664 99 91 138 85% 1180 0%
10 PELA ACA2015 1663 84 81 224 79% 1197 0%
11 EMBRYO 0.4.4.1173 (2017) 1658 37 37 840 74% 1283 0%
PELA 7.5 (2006) 1646 31 30 1418 81% 1185 0%
PELA 7.7 (2016) 1639 62 60 372 76% 1240 0%
HEWER 2008 1635 105 97 120 84% 1160 0%
PELA 7.8 (2017) 1634 37 36 840 72% 1283 0%
12 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1630 37 36 840 72% 1284 0%
GORO 2011 1628 90 88 144 80% 1177 0%
GORO 2012 1607 92 91 144 77% 1192 0%
13 GMOTOR 2011 1606 25 24 2050 73% 1245 0%
PELA 7 (2005) 1606 201 153 56 93% 1054 0%
14 CHIS 4.5 (2017) 1598 36 36 840 70% 1284 0%
SWINE 2008 1596 101 95 120 82% 1162 0%
SWINE 3.1 (2010) 1562 90 87 138 78% 1184 0%
SLOWRENJU 4.0 (2014) 1548 86 84 162 70% 1254 0%
TITO 1.0 (2006) 1546 118 106 90 84% 1130 0%
15 HFM 2008 1545 97 94 120 78% 1164 0%
GORO 2005 1521 93 86 146 84% 1104 0%
CHIS 2016 1510 59 57 372 69% 1244 0%
SWINE 2007 1510 107 98 108 80% 1155 0%
16 XOXO 5.4.2 (2017) 1505 36 36 840 64% 1287 0%
GORO 2009 1483 89 84 132 74% 1192 0%
17 HIGHFIVE 0.7 (2014) 1480 84 82 162 65% 1257 0%
SWINE 2005 1471 89 83 146 81% 1108 0%
18 KANEC 2009 1466 22 22 2320 65% 1243 0%
SLOWRENJU 3.1 (2013) 1464 89 88 156 68% 1193 0%
19 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1456 36 36 840 61% 1289 0%
SWINE 3.0 (2009) 1433 86 82 132 70% 1195 0%
BETA 1.0 (2005) 1431 150 133 56 82% 1067 0%
HFM 2010 1429 85 83 138 69% 1190 0%
HGARDEN 0.4 (2006) 1428 105 100 90 76% 1138 0%
SLOWRENJU 4.1 (2015) 1393 72 71 232 63% 1222 0%
KANEC 2008 1381 92 90 120 67% 1172 0%
GMOTOR 4.0.2 (2007) 1372 44 43 498 66% 1183 0%
KANEC 2006 1368 69 67 198 70% 1153 0%
ZETOR 3 (2016) 1352 55 54 372 59% 1249 0%
20 AMOEBA 2010 1325 34 33 976 59% 1214 0%
AMOEBA 5.3 (2009) 1312 81 79 132 61% 1200 0%
21 EULRING 3.0 (2016) 1310 30 30 1212 53% 1280 0%
22 LICHT 1.0 (2014) 1283 26 26 1606 52% 1271 0%
HFM 2009 1276 80 78 132 58% 1202 0%
ZETOR 1 (2015) 1243 69 68 232 53% 1227 0%
GORO 2007 1241 87 84 108 58% 1170 0%
23 PECUCHET 2007 1230 20 20 2548 50% 1244 0%
24 JUDE 1.0 (2007) 1219 20 20 2548 50% 1244 0%
25 SPARKLE 2.2 (2017) 1219 36 36 840 46% 1295 0%
ZETOR 0.7 (2014) 1216 79 78 162 48% 1267 0%
XOXO 3.0.6 (2016) 1173 51 51 372 47% 1255 0%
26 IGNITOR 1.0 (2016) 1139 51 50 372 44% 1256 1%
KRYSA 2002 1119 117 110 56 55% 1089 0%
27 MENTAT Q1.6 (2005) 1086 19 19 2694 41% 1243 2%
28 NOESIS 2004 1061 25 25 1466 38% 1264 2%
29 TRUNKAT 2002 1060 28 28 1088 41% 1194 0%
GMOTOR 2006 1040 90 89 90 40% 1164 0%
30 IMRO 1.2 (2015) 1019 27 27 1444 34% 1280 1%
31 PUSKVOREC 2003 1011 19 19 2694 35% 1246 0%
32 NABAMOKU 2008 1000 28 28 1228 36% 1222 0%
33 PUREGM 2012 965 56 57 306 31% 1249 0%
34 FASTGOMOKU 20140209 (2014) 957 27 27 1374 29% 1289 2%
35 PISQ 7 (2004) 938 19 19 2694 30% 1248 0%
PUREGM 2011 908 79 81 144 29% 1207 0%
36 DJALL 1.1 (2017) 904 35 36 840 24% 1304 3%
37 LEONARDO 2001 891 29 29 1088 27% 1202 0%
PUREGM 2009 869 57 59 270 23% 1217 0%
38 BENJAMIN 2003 862 19 20 2694 24% 1251 2%
39 AI 1000 (2002) 837 29 30 1088 23% 1204 0%
40 VALKYRIE 1.0 (2013) 822 26 26 1762 21% 1279 0%
41 STAHLFAUST 1.0 (2016) 807 31 32 1212 20% 1295 0%
42 FIVEROW 2008 773 22 22 2440 18% 1263 0%
NABAMOKU 2007 764 93 106 108 15% 1196 0%
DOLORES 2005 741 118 139 56 16% 1116 0%
43 CURNPIS 2000 728 32 33 1088 15% 1210 1%
44 PUREROCKY 2016 727 33 34 1212 15% 1297 1%
XOXO 1.12 (2015) 710 71 75 232 18% 1246 0%
45 CRUSHER 2010 669 26 27 2188 13% 1272 0%
FASTGOMOKU 20150225 (2015) 631 75 80 232 14% 1248 0%
PUREGM 2013 627 59 63 388 13% 1239 0%
46 PROLOG 0.1 (2014) 610 45 48 766 11% 1269 0%
PROLOG 36 608 46 49 840 9% 1313 0%
PUREGM 2008 582 110 140 120 7% 1212 0%
47 MUSHROOM 3.14159 (2011) 416 39 42 2050 4% 1284 0%

The Complete Standard Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2409 146 105 216 98% 1745 1%
YIXIN 0.4.35 (2015) 2217 242 157 56 96% 1632 0%
YIXIN 0.6.9 (2016) 2181 120 98 96 91% 1738 2%
YIXIN 0.2.17C (2013) 2112 250 168 30 93% 1655 0%
2 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 1978 49 47 312 70% 1784 4%
3 SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 1958 59 57 216 68% 1795 3%
YIXIN 0.4.3 (2014) 1957 165 137 36 83% 1639 0%
4 TITO 1.3.2 (2014) 1944 44 42 404 69% 1759 1%
5 HEWER 3.6 (2015) 1928 44 43 368 67% 1772 4%
SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 1903 81 79 96 64% 1773 6%
HEWER 3.4 (2012) 1888 113 104 54 70% 1705 0%
TITO 1.3 (2010) 1876 95 87 78 73% 1680 0%
HEWER 3.5 (2014) 1864 142 129 36 74% 1655 3%
YIXIN 0.2.14P (2012) 1804 145 138 24 60% 1733 4%
HEWER 3.3 (2010) 1719 143 133 24 60% 1657 4%
6 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1665 55 56 216 36% 1828 0%
7 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 1624 55 56 216 32% 1832 2%
CARBON 2.3 (2016) 1596 85 89 96 29% 1811 1%
8 GMOTOR 2011 1595 37 37 482 31% 1793 2%
YIXIN 0.2.7 (2011) 1585 133 144 24 35% 1691 4%
9 PELA 7.5 (2006) 1572 61 64 162 32% 1742 2%
PELA 7.7 (2016) 1550 85 91 96 23% 1817 4%
SLOWRENJU 4.0 (2014) 1534 130 141 36 31% 1710 0%
PELA ACA2015 1532 119 124 48 30% 1756 2%
SLOWRENJU 4.1 (2015) 1530 107 111 56 32% 1730 0%
PELA 7.8 (2017) 1508 58 62 216 18% 1845 6%
10 ZETOR 4 (2017) 1507 59 64 216 19% 1845 0%
ZETOR 3 (2016) 1410 98 117 96 11% 1834 0%
SLOWRENJU 3.1 (2013) 1342 166 250 30 5% 1809 3%
ZETOR 0.7 (2014) 1327 149 209 36 8% 1744 0%
ZETOR 1 (2015) 1323 121 155 56 11% 1760 0%

The Renju Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2725 163 112 144 98% 2106 1%
2 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 2334 59 56 204 68% 2176 1%
3 SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 2316 103 97 60 63% 2192 3%
4 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 2155 63 62 144 48% 2201 1%
5 XL 2016 1982 54 56 204 26% 2238 0%
6 PELA 7.8 (2017) 1970 63 67 144 25% 2232 1%
7 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1927 65 71 144 21% 2239 0%

The Complete Renju Rating:

Rank Name Elo + games score oppo. draws
1 YIXIN 0.6.61 (2017) 2725 163 112 144 98% 2106 1%
YIXIN 0.6.9 (2016) 2640 189 129 60 96% 2127 2%
2 RENJUSOLVER 2008 (2011) 2334 59 56 204 68% 2176 1%
3 SLOWRENJU 5.0.11 (2016) 2316 103 97 60 63% 2192 3%
SLOWRENJU 5.1.1 (2017) 2267 68 64 144 61% 2182 1%
4 CARBON 2.4 (2017) 2155 63 62 144 48% 2201 1%
CARBON 2.3 (2016) 2114 97 99 60 39% 2233 2%
5 XL 2016 1982 54 56 204 26% 2238 0%
6 PELA 7.8 (2017) 1970 63 67 144 25% 2232 1%
7 WHOSE 20170412 (2017) 1927 65 71 144 21% 2239 0%
PELA 7.7 (2016) 1890 106 129 60 13% 2277 2%

All ratings are calculated using Bayesian Elo with eloAdvantage = 0, eloDraw = 0.01, and default prior.
The Elo ratings for gomoku and renju rules are from different rating systems, and should not be compared directly.